Skip to content
NewsRegulation

Federal judge denies xAI bid to block Minnesota nudification ban as law took effect August 1

· by Pondero Newsdesk

The short version

US District Judge Donovan W. Frank on July 31 denied xAI's emergency motion to pause Minnesota's HF 1606, letting $500,000-per-image civil penalties on AI nudification tool operators take effect on schedule.

Federal judge denies xAI bid to block Minnesota nudification ban as law took effect August 1

Minnesota's law targeting AI nudification tools is now in force after US District Judge Donovan W. Frank on July 31 rejected xAI's last-minute bid to freeze enforcement before the August 1 start date. Every AI image provider operating in the state now faces civil penalties of up to $500,000 per image under HF 1606.

What the court decided

Judge Frank denied xAI's motion for a temporary restraining order, ruling that the company's delay in seeking emergency relief "suggests that harm is not immediate," per Valley News Live. xAI filed its motion on July 29, nearly three months after the law was signed and just three days before it took effect. The court denied the TRO but is treating the motion as a request for a preliminary injunction; briefings are scheduled through mid-August, with a hearing set for August 19 in St. Paul.

HF 1606 targets operators of AI nudification services rather than end users. It defines nudification as altering or generating an image to depict an intimate part of an identifiable person not present in the original, unaltered image. The bill passed 132-1 in the Minnesota House and 65-0 in the Senate, per Valley News Live.

xAI's constitutional argument

xAI filed suit on July 27 against Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, arguing HF 1606 violates the First Amendment by imposing strict liability on AI providers regardless of their content policies or technical safeguards, per CryptoBriefing. The company said its Grok Imagine product bans nudification in its terms of service and that xAI suspended more than 50,000 accounts and filed more than 70,000 reports to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children in 2026 alone, per Valley News Live.

xAI also argued the law's definition of "intimate part" was broad enough to sweep in images like shirtless men or people in swimwear. The Attorney General's office responded that the financial harm was not irreparable and that xAI could adjust its product to avoid liability. xAI faces related litigation in other states, including a class action on behalf of five minors and separate suits filed by two Arkansas families over Grok Imagine.

Why it matters

Minnesota is the first US state to impose direct civil liability on AI companies for nudification capabilities, rather than on individual users who misuse those tools, per CryptoBriefing. The statute's survival of an emergency challenge strengthens the legislative template for other states drafting similar bills. Strict liability is the key constraint: having a terms-of-service ban on nudification does not constitute a defense if the technical capability exists. Any AI image platform operating in Minnesota needs to assess whether its image-editing pipeline can produce such output, because the penalty structure applies per image, not per incident.

The case also arrives with no federal AI content law in place. Congress has not moved a preemptive statute, leaving a state-by-state regulatory structure to develop. If Minnesota's law stands through the preliminary injunction stage, similar bills in other legislatures gain a working precedent.

What to watch next

The August 19 preliminary injunction hearing in St. Paul is the next decision point. A second denial would force xAI to restrict Grok Imagine for Minnesota users or risk active enforcement. Other state legislatures tracking the case will read that outcome as confirmation that strict-liability AI nudification laws can survive First Amendment review.

Sources