Make vs n8n
A side-by-side comparison of Make and n8n to help you choose the right AI agent platform for your workflows.
n8n
n8n wins on deployment model and cost at volume; Make wins on zero-ops convenience and a lower cloud entry price.
Your team is technical, has data-residency requirements or high execution volumes where metered pricing hurts, and someone will own the self-hosted runtime.
You want a managed SaaS with no infrastructure overhead, a generous free tier, and visual branching logic without spinning up your own server.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free 1k credits / $9 Core / $16 Pro / $29 Teams | Free (self-hosted), $20/mo Cloud |
| Our Rating | 4.4/5 | 4.3/5 |
| Category | workflow automation | workflow automation |
| Website | https://make.com | https://n8n.io |
Make
Visual automation with operations-based pricing that undercuts Zapier at volume, real branching, and a free tier. The developer-leaning Zapier alternative.
n8n
Fair-code workflow automation with a visual editor, real self-hosting, and 400+ integrations. Where n8n beats Zapier and Make, and the license catch most reviews skip.